Rennes-le-Château

Are we still being primitive, but believing we have made progression?

who belive in miracles?who does really belive Jesus is the son of God?Does anybody belive in God as well as the Church of Rome tells us He is?
Well...I don't. In my opinion we are thousands miles away from the truth.
The same truth betrayed by the Church.Well..I guess Jesus could be an alien as well or someone just like a magician ( come on !! let's be serious please!!).He was "just" a king.

I'm curious about these themes without getting an understanding I can live with (of Jesus, the bloodline).
My understanding, so far, is that we are dealing with an age-old theological use of mythological themes to explain human progression from a primitive state to the present condition of knowledge of sin, misery, and death.
But then, why do some persons take these themes for being facts?
Are we still being primitive, but believing we have made progression?
java script:emoticon(':)')

Greetings: I've recently read a similar opinion that the "the story of the Garden of Eden and several other Biblical Themes are theological use of mythological themes to explain human progression from a state of innocence and bliss to the present human condition of knowledge of sin, misery, and death." Anonymus.

It seems that we here are dealing with at least two lines of evolution:
a) the evolution of the species.
b) the evolution of the Church's Scriptures.
The two lines are most likely going to meet in the future even though the Church froze the evolution of the Sciptures a long time ago.
If this reasoning is correct, and if an unspecified number of the Scriptures come from ancient mythology, many questions arises.
These unspecified Scriptures are assumed to be theological use of mythological themes ment to explain our progression from a primitive state to our present condition, which is still primitive as seen from advanced generations.
In this case, I don't understand why we are researching the mythological bloodline of Jesus.
Anonymus.

I enjoyed the comments by Mark H.
The last sentense made me compare "religion" with Darwin's evolution.
..... the cult of Cernunnos, but once the Church had assigned these symbols to Satan, there was no going back.

By "freezing" the Scripures the "Church" has also made required evolution of the Scriptures, as new and more correct information becomes available, impossible.
This could definately be a "handicap" of the "Church's" teachings.


Darwin's evolution has arrived at the idea that:
1. All organisms (humans) are showing small, randomly variations and these variations are inherited.

Wulf believe me we have spent years studying these matters,educated men disecting doctrines and philosophys,imparting our knowledge in simple language for the man on the street so he might learn the ways of the educated spirit. My advice to you would be to get involved in your local community in some way and perhaps ease your mind of such weighty burdens,all the best Wulf andas i said dont worry too much about it for i fear a timber boat beckons to ferry us all across the nile!

2. All organisms replicate themselves in larger numbers than may grow up.

3. As an average, those replications that are best adapted, will live and replicate themselves in ever larger numbers.
These variations will be replicated and mutated through natural selection into ever new specimen.

4. The mental competence of humans is a result of the evolution. Randomly mutation have created humans, our feelings, ability to reason, our language and our soul.

By comparing the "Scriptures" with Darwin's theorems, we really are comparing life of two different worlds.
Jesus, the bloodline, is an integrated part of the "Scriptures".

Wulf Larson.

Hello all. If we should happen to discover the blood line of jesus, what can we do about it?
I can't imagine what we can improve on ourselves regarding our biological evolution by discovering the blood line.
Our behavioral patterns can hardly be improved, because the patterns are so heavily polluted -thanks to what?- that no improvements will take effect.
If we leave the blood line of Jesus be, what then should we consentrate on?

Wulf Larson.