Rennes-le-Château

Eric Tull alias Roscoe has demonstrated consistently on this forum how ignorant he is about the subject matter of the Priory of Sion and Rennes-le-Chateau. Time after time his points have been answered - and time after time his response has been to ignore those replies AND THEN to pretend that there were no responses to his points.

There is nothing that can be done with people like this.
His website is an embarrassing litany of error after error.
This webpage of his
http://www.rose-croix-veritas.com/de_ch ... ocence.htm
claiming that Philippe de Cherisey never claimed to have created the parchments during his lifetime is a laughing stock. The errors on that webpage are substantial to say the very least and it is no good trying to counter his behaviour because Eric Tull will simply repeat his style - that is, ignore the replies to his points and then to pretend that there were no replies to his points.

Only today, Eric Tull claimed that Philippe de Cherisey's CIRCUIT was a magazine, then a journal, before finally being a Pierre Plantard journal that Philippe de Cherisey contributed to.

Wrong on all counts.
Just like Eric Tull is wrong on all counts on this webpage
http://www.rose-croix-veritas.com/de_ch ... ocence.htm
An embarrassing Litany of error after error.

Quote from Wikipedia:



CIRCUIT stands for:
Chevalerie d'Institutions et Règles Catholiques d'Union Independante et Traditionaliste:

_________________
"In the Aude, the peasants rather believe in the malignant spirit, the fairies and the underground geniuses than with the Virgin and the Angels”

Wrong again
The journal Circuit of 1956 referred to in that article never had anything to do with Philippe de Cherisey
Typical Eric Tull ignorance.

You know through all this pedantry of yours I've just noticed that you've side-stepped my point Yet Again

De Cherisey said that Cheval de Dieu and Blue Apples is a reference to Saint Sulpice which is in direct conflict with what he says in Stone and Paper.

But another nice thought has occurred to me Smith. de Cherisey is playing with Chaumeil. The great Prankster has done one over on Chaumeil and given him a lemon

_________________
"In the Aude, the peasants rather believe in the malignant spirit, the fairies and the underground geniuses than with the Virgin and the Angels”

More idiotic rubbish from a mindless nutcase who is ignorant about the subject matter. Chaumeil puts both "Stone and Paper" and "Circuit" side by side in his book - he deals with both themes in his book.

How many issues of the journal "Circuit" has Eric Tull actually read?

So how does he explain the two different explanations for the same clues?

_________________
"In the Aude, the peasants rather believe in the malignant spirit, the fairies and the underground geniuses than with the Virgin and the Angels”

Just the one.

Page 135 of de Cherisey's CIRCUIT.

Where he describes that Cheval de Dieu is reference the Delacroix painting in Saint Sulpice. Which of course he completely changes to a different explanation in Stone and Paper.

_________________
"In the Aude, the peasants rather believe in the malignant spirit, the fairies and the underground geniuses than with the Virgin and the Angels”

Which is not a magazine
Which is not a journal
Which bears no relation at all to the journals called CIRCUIT that date from 1956 and 1959.

Read the book!
And you may find out more revelations about this hoax that your small minded brain cells will be unable to cope with.

No YOU tell me. I like to see the difference between what you are touting it says compared to what it ACTUALLY says.

_________________
"In the Aude, the peasants rather believe in the malignant spirit, the fairies and the underground geniuses than with the Virgin and the Angels”

Thankyou for posting de Cherisey's attempt at a solution or is Jean Luc Chaumeil up to his old tricks again and faking documents?

_________________
"In the Aude, the peasants rather believe in the malignant spirit, the fairies and the underground geniuses than with the Virgin and the Angels”

You forgot to mention the Loch Ness Monster connection
Nutcase

And you forgot to mention the fact that Jean Luc Chaumeil has tried to tout and sell fake documents in the past and failed to explain to us why we should believe him this time.

_________________
"In the Aude, the peasants rather believe in the malignant spirit, the fairies and the underground geniuses than with the Virgin and the Angels”