Rennes-le-Château

Quit your spamming, Paul. This thread is about Callum's UFO, not your stupid failed RLC hoax campaign.
Now as I was saying before I was so rudely interrupted by spam;

I can only tell you what happened. It was a very atmospheric morning..had been thundering from 8am on....very electrical atmosphere..those who favour the theory of earth energy lines/ley lines having religious buildings perched upon them would say that if you combined the electrical energy about at the time with the ley energy, then all things could be possible to manifest if just for the briefest of seconds..note, I have never said they are 'alien spacecraft', simply ufo's..precisely that..unidentified flying objects...what picked up on film - and I was simply taking angled shots of the Cathedral - must have shown but for the briefest of seconds..there was no opportunity to take further pixs as they had came/went almost in the same second, then nothing in the sky. Any attempts at enlargements have been the efforts of kind ufo enthusiasts that I had posted the pix onto....I'm left, like yourself, to take a look and wonder what I'm seeing. I note no enlargements, as of yet, have been made of the 'bright lights' ufo's..only the rounded and disc shaped one.( The bright lights pic where taken first)

JIM BECK'S TEN COMMANDMENTS

1. The Louis Lawrence Tomb was really the "Poussin Tomb"

2. Forget about Adrien Bourrel's testimony that the Louis Lawrence Tomb was built in 1933. That was a lie and Pierre Jarnac cannot be trusted.

3. Don't worry if you cannot find any independent references to the Louis Lawrence Tomb being the "Poussin Tomb" outside of Pierre Plantard and Philippe de Cherisey.

4. The parchments are genuine - don't worry if you cannot find any independent references to them outside of Pierre Plantard and Philippe de Cherisey.

5. None of Jean-Luc Chaumeil's documented archive relating to the "parchments" can be trusted because he once tried to pull Henry Lincoln's leg over a Rumanian treasure.

6. Believing that the Louis Lawrence tomb was a "Poussin tomb" without any evidence and ignoring the testimony of Adrien Bourrel is sensible and is not to be deemed pseudo-history

7. Believing that the "parchments" are genuine without providing any evidence and ignoring the archive of Jean-Luc Chaumeil is sensible and not to be deemed pseudo-history.

8. Quote the spurious and questionable statements made by people like Dan Brown, Henry Lincoln and Picknett & Prince as if they were historical facts. When their spurious statements are challenged and seen to be discredited, begin to rubbish the nature of debunking.

9. There is a Rennes-le-Chateau mystery. The source of Sauniere's wealth cannot be explained. The evidence of Sauniere's notebooks is to be ignored because it is impossible that he acquired his wealth from the selling of masses. It does not matter about the Trial between Berenger Sauniere and the Carcassonne Bishopric and what evidence that produced.

10. Keep repeating points 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, and 9 always rubbishing debunking in the process.

This is Jim Beck's continuous agenda on this Messageboard in a nutshell.
There is no longer any need to read any of his messages ever again.
Just keep looking this up for reference.

Alright. It doesn't appear that you intentionally faked the picture. Of course, it is unlikely that the date had any connection with the sighting, just a coincidence. Most people don't point a camera up toward the sky so they would miss a momentary appearance of a UFO. You just happened to be taking an upward shot of the tower of the church so you were looking up at the right time. The enlargement does look like other shots of UFOs I have seen. Nice catch, Callum. Even if your Lincoln church code thing doesn't pan out, at least you got what is probably a once in a lifetime UFO photo.

..thanks, Gstar! However, this Lincoln Da Vinci Code thing of mine is a minefield of coincidences! Maybe the real mystery is , what is a coincidence..something that coincides in Time and space...meaningless or meaningful ? I doubt any of us really know or ever will whilst we live and breath on this speck of dust in a vacuum we call earth. The LDVC will either be terminated or take a further step, soon, with the GPR scan. At least it has been appreciated that I have balls - I didn't have to take it this far, and could have left the two well received books as they were..the classic 'is there, or isn't there?' Instead, I'm risking killing them dead, all well as shelling out £1200 out of my own pocket. You only live once and you gotta take risks!
Ce sera sera!

JIM BECK'S TEN COMMANDMENTS

1. The Louis Lawrence Tomb was really the "Poussin Tomb"

2. Forget about Adrien Bourrel's testimony that the Louis Lawrence Tomb was built in 1933. That was a lie and Pierre Jarnac cannot be trusted.

3. Don't worry if you cannot find any independent references to the Louis Lawrence Tomb being the "Poussin Tomb" outside of Pierre Plantard and Philippe de Cherisey.

4. The parchments are genuine - don't worry if you cannot find any independent references to them outside of Pierre Plantard and Philippe de Cherisey.

5. None of Jean-Luc Chaumeil's documented archive relating to the "parchments" can be trusted because he once tried to pull Henry Lincoln's leg over a Rumanian treasure.

6. Believing that the Louis Lawrence tomb was a "Poussin tomb" without any evidence and ignoring the testimony of Adrien Bourrel is sensible and is not to be deemed pseudo-history

7. Believing that the "parchments" are genuine without providing any evidence and ignoring the archive of Jean-Luc Chaumeil is sensible and not to be deemed pseudo-history.

8. Quote the spurious and questionable statements made by people like Dan Brown, Henry Lincoln and Picknett & Prince as if they were historical facts. When their spurious statements are challenged and seen to be discredited, begin to rubbish the nature of debunking.

9. There is a Rennes-le-Chateau mystery. The source of Sauniere's wealth cannot be explained. The evidence of Sauniere's notebooks is to be ignored because it is impossible that he acquired his wealth from the selling of masses. It does not matter about the Trial between Berenger Sauniere and the Carcassonne Bishopric and what evidence that produced.

10. Keep repeating points 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, and 9 always rubbishing debunking in the process.

This is Jim Beck's continuous agenda on this Messageboard in a nutshell.
There is no longer any need to read any of his messages ever again.
Just keep looking this up for reference.