Rennes-le-Château

FIRST OF ALL LET ME FIRST STATE THAT THIS IS NOT COMING FROM PHILIPPE DE CHERSIEY BUT FROM A PAPER HELD BY JEAN LUC CHAUMEIL WHO HAS BEEN KNOWN TO HAVE ATTEMPTED TO SELL FAKE DOCUMENTS IN THE PAST. THIS DOCUMENT HAS HANDWRITING SIMILAR TO THAT OF PHILIPPE DE CHERISEY'S



This does not allude to the fact that de Cherisey composed the phrase BERGERE PAS DE TENTATION.......etc. He is admitting nothing here.

But I will amend my website accordingly.



Nowhere here is de Cherisey admitting he made the whole thing up.






This is entirely consistent with my original theory that the document. Stone and Paper is de Cherisey's own attempt to decipher the text himself.

So the statement at the bottom of the webpage de Cherisey innocence

Which is:

Conclusion
Philippe de Chèrisey wasn't the author of the parchments

_________________
"In the Aude, the peasants rather believe in the malignant spirit, the fairies and the underground geniuses than with the Virgin and the Angels”

This is de Cherisey's attempt to solve the text himself. It is NOT a word by word explanation of how HE composed it

_________________
"In the Aude, the peasants rather believe in the malignant spirit, the fairies and the underground geniuses than with the Virgin and the Angels”

Yes, and a very bizarre attempt indeed. DeCherisey launches into what is obviously one of his few talents, concocting overly verbose fairy tales based extremely loosely on fact. When you really look at it, though, you see that it really has no substance at all. He thinks that he can distract us from the issue by throwing a long mish mash of meaningless gobbledy gook, mostly factually inaccurate at us (showing he was making it up on the spot).
He didn't bother to explain why he even went to all the trouble to make the message by rearranging the letters from the Blanchefort gravestone when he could have simply made up a message based on nothing at all and using a simple substitution code.
Stone and Paper is such an inadequate explanation for the message that it PROVES beyond all doubt that he didn't compose it.

So he wrote his conclusion and registered his solution to Bergere Pas de Tentation....etc with an attorney at law and in his novel he gives his ideas on what the solution to the clues written by someone else is.

I guess he called it messy because he wasn't sure it was correct or not.

_________________
"In the Aude, the peasants rather believe in the malignant spirit, the fairies and the underground geniuses than with the Virgin and the Angels”

You forgot to mention the Loch Ness Monster connection
Nutcase

_________________
"In the Aude, the peasants rather believe in the malignant spirit, the fairies and the underground geniuses than with the Virgin and the Angels”

You forgot to mention the Loch Ness Monster connection
Nutcase

Where are the original parchments, Smith?

You forgot to mention the Loch Ness Monster connection
Nutcase

Why don't you just get them from de Cherisey's lawyer if he has them? I thought Chaumeil was supposed to show the real ones in his book, so where's the picture?

You forgot to mention Bigfoot in connection to your RLC hoax theory.

From Circuit, by P. de Cherisey;

"But nothing can any longer stop Charlotte for whom the words jostle at the postillion gate. Poussin and Teniers are two painters who became famous by The Shepherds of Arcadia for one and The Temptation of St. Antony for the other. The Shepherds is for Poussin as The Temptation is for Teniers. If they could guard their key is it that there no longer exists the lock for this object and that the parchments were not there prior to the revolution and had no provenance with Anton Bigou. But they were from 1861, the era of the third painter (Delacroix)."

Gee, it sure looks to me like de Cherisey thought the message referred to the two painters and their two paintings.

I also have the tables of the letters as shown in the book as they are supposedly produced from the knight's tour. It wouldn't be difficult to see if he used a 25 or 26 letter alphabet to produce them. He doesn't actually show an alphabet and he doesn't show how the last step produced the decoded message. So once I actually check the tables I will know if he really produced the code or not. I'll do that when I have time. I'll scan the pages if anyone wants to see them for themselves.

You mean the kind of people who know that Jean Luc Chaumeil has tried to tout and sell fake documents in the past and that you continually fail to explain to us why we should believe him this time.

_________________
"In the Aude, the peasants rather believe in the malignant spirit, the fairies and the underground geniuses than with the Virgin and the Angels”