Rennes-le-Château

Les forums de Rennes-le-Château
Nous sommes le Sam Mai 25, 2013 12:19 am

Heures au format UTC + 1 heure




Poster un nouveau sujet Répondre au sujet  [ 1094 messages ]  Aller à la page Précédente  1 ... 69, 70, 71, 72, 73  Suivante
Auteur Message
 Sujet du message:
MessagePosté: Ven Aoû 25, 2006 10:23 pm 
JIM BECK'S TEN COMMANDMENTS

1. The Louis Lawrence Tomb was really the "Poussin Tomb"

2. Forget about Adrien Bourrel's testimony that the Louis Lawrence Tomb was built in 1933. That was a lie and Pierre Jarnac cannot be trusted.

3. Don't worry if you cannot find any independent references to the Louis Lawrence Tomb being the "Poussin Tomb" outside of Pierre Plantard and Philippe de Cherisey.

4. The parchments are genuine - don't worry if you cannot find any independent references to them outside of Pierre Plantard and Philippe de Cherisey.

5. None of Jean-Luc Chaumeil's documented archive relating to the "parchments" can be trusted because he once tried to pull Henry Lincoln's leg over a Rumanian treasure.

6. Believing that the Louis Lawrence tomb was a "Poussin tomb" without any evidence and ignoring the testimony of Adrien Bourrel is sensible and is not to be deemed pseudo-history

7. Believing that the "parchments" are genuine without providing any evidence and ignoring the archive of Jean-Luc Chaumeil is sensible and not to be deemed pseudo-history.

8. Quote the spurious and questionable statements made by people like Dan Brown, Henry Lincoln and Picknett & Prince as if they were historical facts. When their spurious statements are challenged and seen to be discredited, begin to rubbish the nature of debunking.

9. There is a Rennes-le-Chateau mystery. The source of Sauniere's wealth cannot be explained. The evidence of Sauniere's notebooks is to be ignored because it is impossible that he acquired his wealth from the selling of masses. It does not matter about the Trial between Berenger Sauniere and the Carcassonne Bishopric and what evidence that produced.

10. Keep repeating points 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, and 9 always rubbishing debunking in the process.

This is Jim Beck's continuous agenda on this Messageboard in a nutshell.
There is no longer any need to read any of his messages ever again.
Just keep looking this up for reference.


Haut
  
 
 Sujet du message:
MessagePosté: Sam Aoû 26, 2006 4:15 am 
You're really hung up on Jim Beck, aren't you Paul.


Haut
  
 
 Sujet du message:
MessagePosté: Sam Aoû 26, 2006 12:19 pm 
JIM BECK'S TEN COMMANDMENTS

1. The Louis Lawrence Tomb was really the "Poussin Tomb"

2. Forget about Adrien Bourrel's testimony that the Louis Lawrence Tomb was built in 1933. That was a lie and Pierre Jarnac cannot be trusted.

3. Don't worry if you cannot find any independent references to the Louis Lawrence Tomb being the "Poussin Tomb" outside of Pierre Plantard and Philippe de Cherisey.

4. The parchments are genuine - don't worry if you cannot find any independent references to them outside of Pierre Plantard and Philippe de Cherisey.

5. None of Jean-Luc Chaumeil's documented archive relating to the "parchments" can be trusted because he once tried to pull Henry Lincoln's leg over a Rumanian treasure.

6. Believing that the Louis Lawrence tomb was a "Poussin tomb" without any evidence and ignoring the testimony of Adrien Bourrel is sensible and is not to be deemed pseudo-history

7. Believing that the "parchments" are genuine without providing any evidence and ignoring the archive of Jean-Luc Chaumeil is sensible and not to be deemed pseudo-history.

8. Quote the spurious and questionable statements made by people like Dan Brown, Henry Lincoln and Picknett & Prince as if they were historical facts. When their spurious statements are challenged and seen to be discredited, begin to rubbish the nature of debunking.

9. There is a Rennes-le-Chateau mystery. The source of Sauniere's wealth cannot be explained. The evidence of Sauniere's notebooks is to be ignored because it is impossible that he acquired his wealth from the selling of masses. It does not matter about the Trial between Berenger Sauniere and the Carcassonne Bishopric and what evidence that produced.

10. Keep repeating points 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, and 9 always rubbishing debunking in the process.

This is Jim Beck's continuous agenda on this Messageboard in a nutshell.
There is no longer any need to read any of his messages ever again.
Just keep looking this up for reference.


Haut
  
 
 Sujet du message:
MessagePosté: Lun Aoû 28, 2006 1:05 pm 
Hors ligne

Inscription: Lun Juin 26, 2006 5:11 pm
Messages: 251
I think he hates me. I feel real bad about that. Not.


Haut
 Profil  
 
 Sujet du message:
MessagePosté: Lun Aoû 28, 2006 9:01 pm 
JIM BECK'S TEN COMMANDMENTS

1. The Louis Lawrence Tomb was really the "Poussin Tomb"

2. Forget about Adrien Bourrel's testimony that the Louis Lawrence Tomb was built in 1933. That was a lie and Pierre Jarnac cannot be trusted.

3. Don't worry if you cannot find any independent references to the Louis Lawrence Tomb being the "Poussin Tomb" outside of Pierre Plantard and Philippe de Cherisey.

4. The parchments are genuine - don't worry if you cannot find any independent references to them outside of Pierre Plantard and Philippe de Cherisey.

5. None of Jean-Luc Chaumeil's documented archive relating to the "parchments" can be trusted because he once tried to pull Henry Lincoln's leg over a Rumanian treasure.

6. Believing that the Louis Lawrence tomb was a "Poussin tomb" without any evidence and ignoring the testimony of Adrien Bourrel is sensible and is not to be deemed pseudo-history

7. Believing that the "parchments" are genuine without providing any evidence and ignoring the archive of Jean-Luc Chaumeil is sensible and not to be deemed pseudo-history.

8. Quote the spurious and questionable statements made by people like Dan Brown, Henry Lincoln and Picknett & Prince as if they were historical facts. When their spurious statements are challenged and seen to be discredited, begin to rubbish the nature of debunking.

9. There is a Rennes-le-Chateau mystery. The source of Sauniere's wealth cannot be explained. The evidence of Sauniere's notebooks is to be ignored because it is impossible that he acquired his wealth from the selling of masses. It does not matter about the Trial between Berenger Sauniere and the Carcassonne Bishopric and what evidence that produced.

10. Keep repeating points 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, and 9 always rubbishing debunking in the process.

This is Jim Beck's continuous agenda on this Messageboard in a nutshell.
There is no longer any need to read any of his messages ever again.
Just keep looking this up for reference.


Haut
  
 
 Sujet du message:
MessagePosté: Ven Sep 01, 2006 12:54 pm 
Here's an image I made of the Pectoral of Princess Sit-hathor-yunet, created during the reign of Pharaoh Senwosret II circa 1897-1878 B.C.E.

Image


Haut
  
 
 Sujet du message:
MessagePosté: Ven Sep 01, 2006 3:52 pm 
Hors ligne

Inscription: Lun Juin 26, 2006 5:11 pm
Messages: 251
I'm beginning to see the whole picture now, the M in the middle stands for Mickey, and you're f'n goofy.


Image


Haut
 Profil  
 
 Sujet du message:
MessagePosté: Ven Sep 01, 2006 10:49 pm 
Hey, that image is my intellectual property. What the hell you think you're doing screwing around with my stuff, Beck? Try drawing your own geometry, and go back to trying to convince the public that St. John is Mary Magdalene. These are all my intellectual properties too, so keep your grimey hands off them, Jim Beck, and go back to Disneyland, where your theories belong!

Image
Image
Image
Image


Haut
  
 
 Sujet du message:
MessagePosté: Ven Sep 01, 2006 10:59 pm 
Okay, I admit that you did a good job of matching up the geometry, proving that Walt Disney was a member of the Rosicrucians and had this geometry incorporated into that image. Now why don't you tell us the origin of this drawing?


Haut
  
 
 Sujet du message:
MessagePosté: Ven Sep 01, 2006 11:54 pm 
Hors ligne

Inscription: Lun Juin 26, 2006 5:11 pm
Messages: 251
you've solved it. Mickey Mouse. MIC = Mary's Immaculate Conception holds the KEY. MO = Modus Operandi. USE = United States of Europe.

Walt really was a Rosicrucian.


Haut
 Profil  
 
 Sujet du message:
MessagePosté: Sam Sep 02, 2006 12:19 am 
Image


Haut
  
 
 Sujet du message:
MessagePosté: Sam Sep 02, 2006 1:02 am 
The pectoral had magical powers.

"Jewelry worn by royal women during the Middle Kingdom was simply for adornment or an indication of status but was also symbolic of concepts and myths surrounding Egyptian royalty. Jewelry imbued a royal woman with superhuman powers and thus enabled her to support the king in his role as guarantor of divine order on earth. It was essentially the king who benefited from the magical powers inherent in the jewelry worn by the female members of his family, which explains why his name, rather than that of the princess, appears in the designs."


Haut
  
 
 Sujet du message:
MessagePosté: Sam Sep 02, 2006 12:59 pm 
Now we know why it was called the "magic kingdom".


Haut
  
 
 Sujet du message:
MessagePosté: Sam Sep 02, 2006 1:05 pm 
Thisa guy designed the map and parts of Disneyland itself- http://www.mouseplanet.com/articles.php?art=fm040714sh


Haut
  
 
 Sujet du message:
MessagePosté: Dim Sep 03, 2006 1:04 am 
The following image is the intellectual property of Brian Ettinger, all rights reserved 2006.

Image


Haut
  
 
Afficher les messages postés depuis:  Trier par  
Poster un nouveau sujet Répondre au sujet  [ 1094 messages ]  Aller à la page Précédente  1 ... 69, 70, 71, 72, 73  Suivante

Heures au format UTC + 1 heure


Qui est en ligne

Utilisateurs parcourant ce forum: Aucun utilisateur enregistré et 0 invités


Vous ne pouvez pas poster de nouveaux sujets
Vous ne pouvez pas répondre aux sujets
Vous ne pouvez pas éditer vos messages
Vous ne pouvez pas supprimer vos messages
Vous ne pouvez pas joindre des fichiers

Rechercher:
Aller à:  
Développé par phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group
Traduction par phpBB-fr.com