Rennes le Chateau

Inscrit le: 26 Sep 2003 Messages: 372

Actually, it's not.

Unless the pyramid schematics were originally drawn by you, and you own the rights to the photograph of the amulet, it's really just a infringement of the Intellectual Property Rights of others.

Invité

My intellectual property is the matching up of those things, not the things themselves. Obviously, I could take my own photo of the amulet and draw my own GP schematic. The one I showed is for demonstration purposes only.

Inscrit le: 26 Sep 2003 Messages: 372

The one you showed is the intellectual property of the Metropolitan Museum of Art, and your use of it is an infringement of their rights and contrary to the Terms and Conditions laid down on their site.

Given their photography policy, even if you did take your own photograph, their rights would still apply.

You cannot claim intellectual property on something which is derived from the intellectual property of others without their prior written consent.

Invité

Fine, in that case here's a better one.

Inscrit le: 26 Sep 2003 Messages: 372

Invité

Here's how the Great Pyramid's slope was derived.

Invité

This image shows it better.

Invité

Invité

I must give credit to Rudolf Gattenbrink for the lovely autoCAD image of the Great Pyramid. Notice that the haxagram/pentagon combination provides a method for squaring a circle very close to perfectly. It corresponds to a Pi value of 3.1409.

Invité

That was, without doubt, the most astonishing image in Egyptology today, IMHO.

Invité

I have made an even superior version of how the Great Pyramid was derived from hexagonal geometry. My image of how the GP matches up with the pectoral was correct but I had them both matched up to the hexagrams incorrectly. Here are the corrected graphics.

Invité

I have started a new Egypt forum at http://gizahex.proboards56.com/index.cgi
where all can freely post their Egypt related discussions.

Invité