Rennes le Chateau

Posté le: Jeu Mai 13, 2004 10:29 pm

when I read Brian's postings - he was really insulting a lot of people.

@ Maffaman,
I read about Saint Germain but after 1784 he never "popped up" again and before 1710 there was no sign of him. Du you have more hints?

Invité

Yeah, I admit that I used to have a penchant for insulting dumb people who provoked me and also for saying that I was a super-genius. Actually, I did two different online IQ tests and one came out to 130 and the other 134. So I do have high intelligence but not really genius level. I guess it doesn't matter how much you've got but how you use it, as they say.
Time has shown that my Poussin and Teniers solutions that other forum members were criticising are still unsurpassed. There is still no serious competition to them on the entire web or in any book. In fact, far from falling apart, my theory has only become stronger over time. By discovering the exact same geometry in several more Poussin paintings and even in da Vinci's Last Supper it has become a virtual certainty that my theory was correct all along- http://davincisolved.4t.com
I tried to tell those other forum members that they were making a mistake in criticising my theory but they just wouldn't listen. How many of THEM can claim to have solved anything about da Vinci's Last Supper?

Inscrit le: 31 Déc 2005 Messages: 526

Gstar a écrit:

Yeah, I admit that I used to have a penchant for insulting dumb people who provoked me and also for saying that I was a super-genius. Actually, I did two different online IQ tests and one came out to 130 and the other 134. So I do have high intelligence but not really genius level. I guess it doesn't matter how much you've got but how you use it, as they say.
Time has shown that my Poussin and Teniers solutions that other forum members were criticising are still unsurpassed. There is still no serious competition to them on the entire web or in any book. In fact, far from falling apart, my theory has only become stronger over time. By discovering the exact same geometry in several more Poussin paintings and even in da Vinci's Last Supper it has become a virtual certainty that my theory was correct all along- http://davincisolved.4t.com
I tried to tell those other forum members that they were making a mistake in criticising my theory but they just wouldn't listen. How many of THEM can claim to have solved anything about da Vinci's Last Supper?

"Truths too fine spun are subtle fooleries"

Yours are too fine spun.

Citation:

How many of THEM can claim to have solved anything about da Vinci's Last Supper?

Jim Beck (Last Supper) and Schellenberger and Andrews (Les Bergers d'Arcadie)

The solution is a hell of lot simpler than you think.

http://www.rose-croix-veritas.com/index.htm

Invité

Are you nuts Roscoe? Because if you seriously think Jim Beck's or Andrews and Schellenberger's "solutions" are even in the same league as mine then you must be. My solution is too "finely spun" is it? Yeah, too finely spun for YOU to unravel, that's for damn sure.
When you are actually able to identify a single flaw in my solutions, let me know will ya? Until then you're just blowing hot air as far as I can see.
Show me how the middle staff in Poussin's 1640 Shepherdess painting is at 72 degrees to ANYTHING in the painting and maybe I'll take Andrews and Schellenberger's "solution" seriously. They were off by a full 3 degrees. How did you miss THAT Roscoe? Were your eyeglasses in the shop that day?

Posté le: Dim Juin 18, 2006 9:47 am

Brian,
you show up and start insulting again. Just be cool. Critics should be taken like a man. Don't pull the trigger as soon as another nose appears on the horizon.

Roscoe,
I read the text on your site. Apart from the Prieuré stuff (which is not proven at all) you don't come up with an "eye-opener". (Sorry that my english is not so good ... but why don't we continue in hungarian?

) You create the impression that you are IN THE KNOW, that you are one of these SOLIS SACERTOTIS or even SACERTOTISSIMUS. But then .... nothing new under the sun. For shure you will have a satisfying explanation why so. I bet.

Invité

eginolf a écrit:

Brian,
you show up and start insulting again. .

Where's the insult? I simply asked Roscoe a question, if he was nuts. I was concerned about him. You OK Roscoe? Can I get you a thorazine?

Inscrit le: 31 Déc 2005 Messages: 526

Gstar a écrit:

Are you nuts Roscoe? Because if you seriously think Jim Beck's or Andrews and Schellenberger's "solutions" are even in the same league as mine then you must be. My solution is too "finely spun" is it? Yeah, too finely spun for YOU to unravel, that's for damn sure.
When you are actually able to identify a single flaw in my solutions, let me know will ya? Until then you're just blowing hot air as far as I can see.
Show me how the middle staff in Poussin's 1640 Shepherdess painting is at 72 degrees to ANYTHING in the painting and maybe I'll take Andrews and Schellenberger's "solution" seriously. They were off by a full 3 degrees. How did you miss THAT Roscoe? Were your eyeglasses in the shop that day?

I smell what you are shovelling.

Inscrit le: 31 Déc 2005 Messages: 526

Tomb at Les Pontils

Invité

The part about the cathedral in Carcassonne is interesting. The SP emblem really is very similar to the PS at the top of the tombstone, same oval shape surrounding it, same dash between the two letters, just the letters reversed. I hadn't heard about this before, if that was your discovery it is certainly a significant one and a very nice find.
What I also find interesting is that this is a cathedral of st. Vincent and there is a chapel of St. Vincent in Paris, in the same complex as St. Sulpice, in which Poussin's Institution of the Eucharist painting originally hung. That painting contains the same geometry as his Shepherdess painting and depicts the Holy Grail- http://grailstar.4t.com/eucharist.htm
As for the vertical line on the Shepherdess tomb representing the Rose Line, that could be one thing it was intended for. The fact that it is not vertical but almost two degrees from it indicates that it must also have had some other purpose. I have clearly shown that the purpose of that angle is that it is part of a geometry concealed in the painting. I am the only person on earth who actually has an explanation for the exact angle of the vertical tomb line, which is NOT 1.5 degrees from vertical as Tomb of God suggested but a little over 1.81810889 degrees. If you blew the painting image up to a large enough size, I predict that this exact angle could be verified (using the left edge of the canvas as a reference for true vertical or a line across the tops of the left and right staves as true horizontal).
Until someone else is able to explain that precise angle, and the precise angles of all three staves, I will continue to claim to be the one and only true solver of the Poussin Shepherdess painting, in addition to Teniers St. Antony and St. Paul painting, the Poussin Eucharist painting, Poussin's Sacrament of Penance, Sacrament of Marriage and Sacrament of the Holy Eucharist paintings, the 1618 Rosicrucian print and last but not least da Vinci's Last Supper painting.
I have a feeling it is going to be a little difficult for anyone to top that. Not only did I solve the Shepherdess painting but I confirmed it with a bunch of other Poussin paintings, established the likely designer of the geometry as being Leonardo da Vinci and established that the geometry was known to the Rosicrucians with the 1618 print.
Guess what, Rennes-le-Chateau researchers are actully STILL ignoring ALL of this. i could understand them having doubts when it was just the one Poussin painting and the Tenier painting but I think it is VERY obvious by now that I was correct all along. How the HELL are people like Lincoln going to explain away ALL of those art works PERFECTLY matching up with the exact same incredibly complex geometry? They can't, plain and simple. Now they realize that they were indeed idiots, as I indicated at the time, and there is no way around it other than trying desperately to pretend that all that stuff on my website doesn't exist. Well it is going to be very hard with me going around forums like this one and posting the link. The very silence of all these supposed experts is mute testament to the fact that they are at a total loss to explain away any of it.
Try it Roscoe, or Ian. Explain away the geometry in the Shepherdess painting. Then I will ask you to explain away the same geometry in each of six more works of art, one at a time. The old "coincidence" excuse is going to fall apart after about the third or fourth work of art and then you've got nothing.

Invité

Actually, I should have said the Poussin Eucharist painting was in the Chapel of St. Germaine which is in the MONASTERY of St. Vincent, which is the same complex in which St. Sulpice is.